Featured post

लोग क्या सोचेंगे

जब भी कुछ करते है सबसे पहले हमारे दिमाग में यही बात आती है कि लोग क्या सोचेंगे? समाज क्या कहेगा? अब ए समज लीजिए कि समाज मतलब है कौन? हमारे आ...

Wednesday 24 October 2018

Bhavai

Bhavni Bhavai is the film directed by Ketan Mehta the plot was located in the small village of Gujarat the film have story of king. The focus area film are  untouchability satire politics imagination versus reality headset he is the film The Touch of reality at the every point.
The most not worthy thing of the cell is action reaction framing and dialogues which creates search of harmonic atmosphere the film is satire on politics and it's not about the great king who fight in the world in a painter listen to control the situation is seems like a fool and so innocent people have to suffer. The character of king its symbol of andher Nagri gandu Raja the name of the King Chakrasen(worldruler) is totally opposite from his character. Even Jivo(life) is like a cursed.
On the name of caste and class as well as untouchability the one who is marginalised have to keep mum and just sacrifice everything the film begins with Migration of untouchable people even it narrates like Bhavai(Street play). The worst situation of subaltern is described it through the character of jio and other untouchable people when the film Bhavni Bhavai ednds the film Do Bigha Zameen has been gone further.
According to Shyam Benegal,
" tradition in popular Indian cinema is not the reality but an ideal as an ideal it has been sanitized concerning itself not with the harsh realities of caste untouchability gender discrimination in the varieties of feudal economic oppression that exist in traditional society but rather to evokes​ a nostalgic sentiment and sense of belonging to the uncertainty is of tradition the idea of inviolability of the family signifying oneself for the family is considered highest virtue."
And the name of tradition some of the  time people were exploited a lot and on the name of virtue,sacrifice for family or country is known as martyrs. The Sacrifice Of jio considered as a multi room but here it doesn't has which to do that and he was forced to be sacrificed he asked question,
" my head goes this way
my rest was that way
which side will be I on?"
It disturb and make audience think about existence of human being. Human being always have a search of self existentialism suits to connect it with the question of Jivo.
Gayatri spivak has been authored can subaltern speak the film has given voice to them but is still film has fine answer and it's show the state of upper class.
" Even if we accept the conditions we know how to crush them down"
According to  Vidyarthy Chatterjee '
     "If Ketan Mehta has chosen to retire from filmmaking after Bhavni Bhavai, he would still have been remembered for long as a major director, such was the strength, skill and subtlety of his first film. Bhavni Bhavai left the audience speechless with its then 28 year old director Ketan Mehta's daring innovative style, its formal experimentation, its visual richness, the hilarious, energetic performances of its leading players, and its deeply moving story which could be easily followed despite its disinterest in linearity. The film is radical as much in form as in its politics.”
The technique of two ending first one give relief to audience as it was happily ending but the second looks realistic and just like Franz Kafta said 'Axe for the frozen sea within us'.
Action and reaction is something to be noticed throughout the film economy of the kingdom is reason behind the foolish King the scene liking declared the word but not able to pull his own sword. The narrator described the king was crying because he doesn't has son and just after that was bathing buy milk when the news of Queens pregnancy declared by the lady sucking hard punished some untouchables so one of them was dead. All those scenes were intermingled with each other and its combination of opposites and satire.

Sunday 16 September 2018

એક સવાલ

એક સવાલ ઘણા સમયથી મને હેરાન કરે છે. આમ તો હું નાની હતી ત્યાર થી જ મને વાર્તાઓ વાંચવાનો શોખ હતો એટલે કંઇ પણ મળે વાંચી નાખતી. હવે ખબર પડી કે એ કંઇ પણ વાંચી નાખવાની આદત એ મને ઘણું શીખવી દીધું છે. કદાચ એટલે જ આજે કોઈને સવાલ પૂછવાનો સમય આવી જાય.

સ્વામિનારાયણ ભગવાન અને કૃષ્ણ આ બંન્નેની લીલાઓ એક. સરખી ઘણી છે. લગભગ જ્યાં સુધી મને ખબર છે વિષ્ણુ ના દશ અવતાર છે અને દરેક અવતાર ની અલગ અલગ કથા છે. દસેય અવતાર માં ભગવાને એક જ લીલા બીજી વાર કરી હોય એવું મારા વાંચવામાં નથી આવ્યું.

કૃષ્ણ એ માતા જશોદા ને પોતાના મુખમાં પૂરા વિશ્વ નું દર્શન કરાવેલું અને એ જ વાત મે ઘનશ્યામ મહારાજની પણ વાંચી. ભક્તિ માતા ને એમણે પૂરા વિશ્વ નું દર્શન કરાવેલું. હવે આ સવાલ એ થયો કે સાચું શું? કૃષ્ણ અને ઘનશ્યામ એક જ છે? તો એ દશાવતાર માં કેમ નથી? જ્યારે કલ્કિ અવતાર જે હજુ થયો પણ નથી એની વાત તો છે.

હમણાં એક પાક્કા સ્વામિનારાયણ ભકત ને મળવાનું થયું. મારે પાછા સવાલો તો હોય જ. આ સવાલ બહુ જ સરળ છે પરંતુ મારે વાંચવામાં ક્યાંય નહિ આવ્યું એટલે નહિ ખબર. " ઘનશ્યામે દીક્ષા લીધી પછી એ નીલકંઠવર્ણી બન્યા. પછી એ જ સહજાનંદ સ્વામી બન્યા અને એ જ ભગવાન સ્વામિનારાયણ. અને જ્યાં સુધી મને ખબર છે ત્યાં સુધી જ્યારે માણસ દીક્ષા લે ત્યારે એ બધા જ વૈભવ નો ત્યાગ કરે છે અને વસ્ત્રો પણ સાદા પહેરે છે. વર્ધમાન દીક્ષા લઈને મહાવીર સ્વામી બન્યા અને જૈન ધર્મની સ્થાપના કરી. સિદ્ધાર્થ ગૌતમ હતા એ બુદ્ધ બન્યા.

જેવી રીતે કોઈ જૈન દેરાસર માં જઈને જુઓ તો ભગવાન મહાવીરની દિગંબર મૂર્તિ ની જ પૂજા થાય છે. ભગવાન બુદ્ધનાં પણ ભગવા કપડાં માં જ પૂજા થાય છે. પરંતુ સહજાનંદ સ્વામી નો શૃંગાર તો આજ મહારાજા જેવો છે. મે વાંચેલી બુકમાં પણ એમનું વર્ણન કરેલું હોય છે કે એમના દરબાર માં સાધુ સંતો, ભક્તિ, લડુબા,જીવુબા, દાદા ખાચર વગેરે હતા.  શું એક દીક્ષા લીધેલા માણસ ને શૃંગાર કરવા એ પાપ નથી? એ ધર્મ ની વિરૃદ્ધ નથી? અને એવું હોય તો મહાવીર સ્વામી ને દિગંબર ના બદલે હીરા મઢેલા વસ્ત્રો કેમ નથી પહેરાવતા?

આટલી બધી વાતો પછી પણ મારો સવાલ ત્યાં. જ છે. કે સહજનંદ સ્વામી મહારાજ એ ભગવા વસ્ત્રો છોડીને ખંતીલો ખેસ, જરકસી જામા,રૂડી પાઘ અને ઢોલિયે પોઢણ ક્યારે અપનાવ્યું હતું?

આ વાતો કોઈ ની લાગણી દુભાવવા નથી પરંતુ મારા આ સવાલ નો સંતોષકારક જવાબ મને આટલા વર્ષો પછી પણ કોઈ એ આપ્યો નથી. જો આપને ખબર હોય તો જવાબ જરૂર આપજો. આતો કરા ભણેલા ગણેલા રહ્યા એટલે સવાલ કરવાની ટેવ પડી ગઈ છે પછી એ ભલે ને ભગવાન કેમ ના હોય?

Thursday 5 April 2018

The Bet- Will you be able to win?

Hello Everyone,
My this blog will be totally different from my earlier blogs. I am not going to describe any issue, not any problem but its about one story i read in the morning. Its my first step. I have started to read one short story in the morning and will get the all positive ideas and get psychological state of people.

This morning i read the story"The Bet" written by Anton Chekhov. It was such a story with suspense and at the last it leave us to think about the end. The story is about human as social animal. Bankers was worried about money while lawyer was gaining knowledge and become more and more knowledgeable. He read a lot and it may become helpful to understand the world better. But even after becoming such a knowledgeable and wise he couldn't wait till the morning. He escaped from there. If he has shown little more daring or some more patience than he may win money and bet also.

He has waited for fifteen years so four hours were nothing to compare he has passed in that room. Lets put yourself in the shoes of lawyer and writer as some difficult situation. Now think.Is it the wish of character or the writer? Lawyer want to escape or the writer made him to run?

Still if you haven't read the story than click on the link given below and enjoy one of the best story of Chekhov.

http://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-stories/UBooks/Bet.shtml


Do not forget to give your reply.

Monday 26 March 2018

What is the use ??????

Finally, after a long time i got a point which is confusing me more and more. What if you don't remember all the dialogues and characters of play written by the great Shakespear? What if you don't remember every poem written by Wordsworth? What if you don't remember the third paragraph of theory of Tradition and individual talent? What if you don't remember the last paragraph of Wuthering Heights? Think about it. I know the answer and that is- you will fail in the examination. Hahahha. I really don't understand logic behind these types of questions.
                         
When one student is preparing for PhD than the first step is Research methodology. Without that knowledge no one would be able to write proposal. The second thing is knowledge of criticism but not word to word but only the most important part of the theory. Yesterday i have attended PET of VNSGU. there was such questions which made me confused. There was not a single question regarding research methodology, very few questions from criticism, and full paper was from history only. Last year i have completed M.A. and this year i want to start further study so i have applied there. But they are expecting from me that i must have read all the novels,criticism and poems from 430 BC to present day. and its not only about English literature but also African, Indian writing in English. 

I know that any of the research should be "standing on giant's shoulder" so it is important know about all theories and literature. Knowledge of the texts become helpful to support your topic. But that doesn't mean everything which comes under LITERATURE will be helpful to your research.

There is one more thing-they don't allow to carry question paper after examination. They used to take it with answer shit. and after that they are ready to give us copy of our answer shit. I really don't understand logic behind this. What will student do with OMR sheet without question paper? 

these are the things which bother me a lot. If you have any answer than please write in comment section below.